<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Online Media Cultist - Latest Comments in Why would a Fox News SVP call Facebook &amp;#8220;the leading social network&amp;#8221;?</title><link>http://onlinemediacultist.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://onlinemediacultist.disqus.com/why_would_a_fox_news_svp_call_facebook_8220the_leading_social_network8221/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:07:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why would a Fox News SVP call Facebook &amp;#8220;the leading social network&amp;#8221;?</title><link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/08/18/why-would-a-fox-news-svp-call-facebook-the-leading-social-network/#comment-1644684</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Truth or not, why be surprised by anything coming out of Fox News?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;p.s.  Alexa... why? why keep citing their rankings?? You even say yourself "barrels of salt".  They indicate nothing. No amount of argument or debate will lend any credence to any metric coming out of Alexa... it sets a bad example... please... no more Alexa. Comscore, Google Trends, hell, even use numbers reported by the organizations themselves (all three still plagued by inaccuracy)... but I beg of you no more Alexa. :-P&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Shaulis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:07:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>