<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Online Media Cultist - Latest Comments in Twitter as full-fledged publishing platform</title><link>http://onlinemediacultist.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://onlinemediacultist.disqus.com/twitter_as_full_fledged_publishing_platform/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:23:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter as full-fledged publishing platform</title><link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/12/12/twitter-as-full-fledged-publishing-platform/#comment-4394490</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Been using &lt;a href="http://bit.ly" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="bit.ly"&gt;bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; for same reason. Love the stats you get with the more advanced URL shorteners.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hutch Carpenter</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:23:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter as full-fledged publishing platform</title><link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/12/12/twitter-as-full-fledged-publishing-platform/#comment-4390173</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We have just launched &lt;a href="http://twitblogs.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="twitblogs.com"&gt;twitblogs.com&lt;/a&gt; you might want to have a look as it is a fully fledged publishing platform. The analytics foillow shortly as do the revenue opportunities. Give it a go and let me know what you think . &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sam Sethi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:57:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter as full-fledged publishing platform</title><link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/12/12/twitter-as-full-fledged-publishing-platform/#comment-4381411</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I first saw it some time ago, and think tweetstats is very cool !&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Berlin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:21:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter as full-fledged publishing platform</title><link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/12/12/twitter-as-full-fledged-publishing-platform/#comment-4381399</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's a great point Mike and will help bring data into the ROI conversations that inevitably come up. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Berlin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:20:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter as full-fledged publishing platform</title><link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/12/12/twitter-as-full-fledged-publishing-platform/#comment-4381212</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark, I used TinyURL for a long time but recently switched over to adjix as I was enamored of the possibilities of monetizing link sharing. My take so far is that while I think the service has potential, the slow performance of the site can be annoying (whereas TinyURL is lightning quick) and the money side seems quite a ways off from being meaningful. All that's to say that a service like &lt;a href="http://cli.gs" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="cli.gs"&gt;cli.gs&lt;/a&gt; can be a really nice bridge to provide microbloggers with a piece of the analytic puzzle as you mention.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Berlin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:03:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter as full-fledged publishing platform</title><link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/12/12/twitter-as-full-fledged-publishing-platform/#comment-4381174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jens, I agree with part of what you said very strongly, and disagree on another point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You say that "Twitter by itself is actually unusable." I use the "basic" Twitter service -- through the web interface -- much of the time and personally get a great deal out of it. Totally agree that 3rd party apps enhance the base service greatly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You make an amazing point positing a future twitter freemium account. People such as Jason Calacanis have long called for a "professional" version of Twitter that charges subscription, and something like what you mention could end up being a part of that mix. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Berlin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:00:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter as full-fledged publishing platform</title><link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/12/12/twitter-as-full-fledged-publishing-platform/#comment-4368459</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Eric,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have you seen &lt;a href="http://tweetstats.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tweetstats.com"&gt;http://tweetstats.com&lt;/a&gt; ? I built it about a year ago now to track my own stats on my usage of Twitter. I'd love to jack it into the Twitter backend to get some more interesting data (who's coming to your profile and how), alas, that data lives with Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dacort</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:03:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter as full-fledged publishing platform</title><link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/12/12/twitter-as-full-fledged-publishing-platform/#comment-4368065</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As Twitter continues to grow, finding a way to track analytics seems like a natural progression. Currently there are a number of different websites that allow you to track followers, friends, link-clicking, mentions, etc., but there isn't one solution (yet) that will do it all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's the type of analytics application I look forward to seeing, as I think it will finally move most businesses over the edge into joining the microblogging world. Businesses can hear testimonials about its value, but getting down and dirty and pulling statistics will be easier to sell them on the concept.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Templeton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:43:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter as full-fledged publishing platform</title><link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/12/12/twitter-as-full-fledged-publishing-platform/#comment-4367528</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Eric,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree that analytics would add an interesting angle to how people use Twitter. One way that I "cheat" right now is using &lt;a href="http://cli.gs" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="cli.gs"&gt;cli.gs&lt;/a&gt; when I want to publish shortened URLs on Twitter. &lt;a href="http://Cli.gs" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Cli.gs"&gt;Cli.gs&lt;/a&gt; gives you information on how many clicks your link attractions, and where the clicks are coming from geographically.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mark&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Evans</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:10:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter as full-fledged publishing platform</title><link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/12/12/twitter-as-full-fledged-publishing-platform/#comment-4367035</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Eric,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree that analytics would add an interesting angle to how people use Twitter. One way that I "cheat" right now is using &lt;a href="http://cli.gs" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="cli.gs"&gt;cli.gs&lt;/a&gt; when I want to publish shortened URLs on Twitter. &lt;a href="http://Cli.gs" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Cli.gs"&gt;Cli.gs&lt;/a&gt; gives you information on how many clicks your link attractions, and where the clicks are coming from geographically.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mark&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Evans</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:39:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter as full-fledged publishing platform</title><link>http://onlinemediacultist.com/2008/12/12/twitter-as-full-fledged-publishing-platform/#comment-4364734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have been thinking along exactly these lines just this week. I guess this might be the tipping point for twitter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What I found is this: Twitter by itself is actually unusable. BUT, when you use it with all the 3rd part apps such as TweetBeep and Twitterific, then it suddenly becomes very very interesting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I see Twitter as a platform now. But the value arises out of the apps. In a sense, Twitter could be like an email standard. A standard that allows people to communicate in particular way. But if you want to have that really cool Email program: then you gotta pay...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jens</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 07:01:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>